Knierzinger, Johannes. "Chieftaincy and development in Ghana: From political intermediaries to neotraditional development brokers. "Department of Anthropology and African Studies of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 124 (2011).
The article posits that traditional authority figures are today best referred to as neo-traditional actors who are involved in the development of Ghana. These actors comprise of stool fathers, elders, linguists, development chiefs, chiefs, and queen mothers. There is an intersection between chieftaincy, politics, and development. Politics and development go hand in hand because when chiefs are concerned with the development of their areas, they are indirectly doing politics as they charge on government of the day to bring development to their communities. Chiefs are still popular because the institution is credited with the ability to adapt to change and fluidity as a neo-traditional system. The Chiefly elite is part of the political elite in Ghana performing functions such as dispute settlement, custodians of land, repository of customary law and ensuring community participation in development. They are development brokers who lobby international agencies and government for projects to be brought to their communities. Chiefs use social capital; social networks, maintain relationships between them and the government. Chiefs shifted focus to development agents because of their reduce roles in formal politics.